Legal Review of the Execution of Movable Objects Based on Fiduciary Guarantees Against Default Debtors from the Perspective of Islamic Law

Authors

  • Arief Rahman Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
  • Danang Wahyu Muhammad Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v21i2.799

Keywords:

Fiduciary Guarantee, Default, Islamic Law

Abstract

The institutions involved in fiduciary guarantee services are constantly and continuously developing due to the increasing and evolving needs of the surrounding community. This directly impacts the people defaulting on their fiduciary guarantees or unable to repay their debts. In this case, debt transfers are often observed, requiring a down payment or guarantee money for the first one or two months. Debtors also commonly struggle to make subsequent payments, as they prioritize new goods or other secondary needs. This leads to defaults on transactions initiated by the debtor, ultimately causing harm to the creditor institution in terms of transferring fiduciary guarantee objects. Therefore, this study aims to compare the regulation of fiduciary guarantee objects transfer from the perspective of Islamic law. In this case, a qualitative research approach was employed by conducting a normative juridical analysis. A comparison was also carried out between the doctrines of formal and Islamic law within the local community. The results obtained are expected to minimize instances of default by debtors and protect the interests of creditors when transferring the objects of fiduciary guarantees in the future.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Journals

Bouzen, Robert & Ashibly. “Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Terhadap Debitur Yang Wanprestasi Setelah Keluarnya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019.†Jurnal Gagasan Hukum, Vol. 3, No. 2 (2021): 137-148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31849/jgh.v3i02.8907

Dewi, Cok Istri Dian Laksmi. “Pengikatan Jaminan Kebendaan Dengan Fidusia.†Jurnal Yustita, Vol. 13, No. 1 (2019): 15-25. https://ojs.unr.ac.id/index.php/yustitia/article/view/265

Kusuma D., Made Bagas Ari, Komang Febrinayanti Dantes, Ni Ketut Sari Adnyani. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Debitur Yang Melakukan Wanprestasi Terhadap Objek Jaminan Fidusia Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia.†Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia, Vol. 3, No. 3 (2020): 271-282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jatayu.v3i3.32873

Nugraha, Sigit Nurhadi, Nurlaili Rahmawati. “Cidera Janji (Wanprestasi) Dalam Perjanjian Fidusia Berdasarkan Pasal 15 Ayat (3) UU Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 18/PUU-XVII/2019 Dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: /PUU-XIX/2021.†AL WASATH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021): 77-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47776/alwasath.v2i2.213

Putra, Muhammad Ikhsan Awaljon, Maryati Bachtiar, Riska Fitriani. “Eksekusi Terhadap Benda Jaminan Fidusia Yang Tidak Didaftarkan Pada PT. Capella Multidana.†JOM Fakultas Hukum 3 (1) (2016): 2. https://jom.unri.ac.id/index.php/JOMFHUKUM/article/view/10182

Sabir, Muhammad & Rifka Tunnisa. “Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Transaksi Perbankan (Studi Komparatif Hukum Positif dan Hukum Islam.†Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab, Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): 80-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24252/mh.v2i1.14284

Sutarjo, Achmad Yusuf. “Akibat Hukum Debitur Wanprestasi Pada Perjanjian Pembiayaan Konsumen Dengan Obyek Jaminan Fidusia Yang Disita Pihak Ketiga.†Jurnal Privat Law 6 (1) (2018): 95-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/privat.v6i1.19240

Wahyuni, Yeyen. “Parate Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019.†Interdisciplinary Journal on Law, Social Sciences and Humanities, Volume 02, Issue 1 (2021), 65-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19184/ijl.v2i1.22760

Widjaja, Gunawan, Karunia Ilham Karim, Dheas Syahreza Muslim. “Perjanjian Penyerahan Sebagai Perjanjian Ikutan Atau Kewajiban?.†Jurnal Cakrawala Ilmiah, Vol. 1, No. 6 (2022): 1383-1391. https://www.bajangjournal.com/index.php/JCI/article/view/1505

Books

Al-Zuhaili, Wahbah. Al-Fiqh Al-Islami Wa Adillatuhu. Vol. VI. Beirut: Dar Al-Fikr, 2002.

Efendi, Joenaidi & Johnny Ibrahim. Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Empiris. 2nd Ed. Depok: Prenadamedia Group, 2018.

HS, Salim. Perkembangan Hukum Jaminan di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Grafindo Persada 2008.

Huda, Nurul & Mohamad Heykal. Lembaga Keuangan Islam: Tinjauan Teoritis dan Praktis. Jakarta: Kencana, 2013, Cet. ke-2.

Mustofa, Imam. Fiqh Muamalah Kontemporer. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo, Persada, 2016.

Saliman, Abdul R. Esensi Hukum Bisnis Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana, 2004.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-31

How to Cite

Rahman, A. ., & Muhammad, D. W. . (2021). Legal Review of the Execution of Movable Objects Based on Fiduciary Guarantees Against Default Debtors from the Perspective of Islamic Law. Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 21(2), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v21i2.799