Restructuring of Debt Payment Obligation Suspension Agreements Homologated Due to Covid-19 Non-Natural Disasters

Authors

  • Hanin Alya' Labibah Universitas Bojonegoro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v22i1.1229

Keywords:

Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations, Homologation, Covid-19

Abstract

The quick spread of the Covid-19 pandemic weakened the economy and led to the non-performance of debtors’ obligations because their business did not run smoothly during the period. Several business actors with homologated PKPU peace were hindered or prevented from achieving their aims including the force majeure qualifications associated with the Covid-19 pandemic. Therefore, this normative legal research conducted through statutory, conceptual, and case approaches was used to assess this situation. The findings showed that a debtor can request to restructure the homologation implementation based on the force majeure of the Covid-19 pandemic but the request needs to be based on the agreement between the debtor and creditor using Article 1338 paragraph (1) of the Civil Code as the premise. It was discovered from the PT Berlian Tenker case that the agreement was conducted without requiring further re-homologation in the court because the UUK-PKPU is not applicable in the matter due to the fact that the Covid-19 pandemic is a national disaster classified as a relative force majeure.

References

Journal Articles

Anand, Ghansam. “Prinsip Kebebasan Ber-kontrak dalam Penyelesaian Kontrak.†Yuridika, 26, 2 (2011): 90. DOI: 10.30742/perspektif.v11i3.276

Bagus, Putu & Ni Ketut S.D. “Kajian Force Majeure terkait Pemenuhan Prestasi Perjan-jian Komersial Pasca Penetapan Covid-19 sebagai Bencana Nasional.†Jurnal Kertha Semaya, 8, 6 (2020): 898. DOI: ojs.unud.ac.id/kerthasemaya/60631/35194

Hernoko, Agus Yudho. “Force Majeur Clause atau Hardship Clause Problematika dalam Perancangan Kontrak Bisnis.†Jurnal Per-spektif, XI, 2 (2006): 208. DOI: 10.30742/perspektif.v11i3.276

Irwanti, Kartika & Anggit Sinar Sitoresmi, “Permohonan Penundaan Kewajiban Pem-bayaran Utang dan Akibat Hukum ter-hadap PT. Asmin Koalindo Tuhup ber-dasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004.†Pandecta, 13, 2 (2019): 121. DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v14i2.16902

Kornelis, Yudi & Florianus Yudhi P.A. “Im-plementasi Restrukturisasi dalam Proses Kepailitan dan PKPU di Indonesia.†Jurnal Selat, 7, 2 (2020): 270. DOI: 10.24034/ j25485024.y2010.v14.i1.231

Parama, Putu A.W. & I Ketut A. “Akibat Hukum terhadap Debitor atas Terjadinya Force Majeure (Keadaan Memaksa).†Jurnal Kertha Semaya, 2, 6 (2014): 5. DOI: ojs.unud.ac.id/kerthasemaya/10277/7513

Respatia, Wimba. “Kebijakan Restrukturisasi Utang Melalui Debt To Equity Swap.†Ekui-tas, 4, 1 (2010):84. DOI: 10.24034/ j25485024.y2010.v14.i1.231

Books

Fred, BG Tumbuan dalam Rudy A Lontoh et.al (Editor). Hukum Kepailitan: Penyelesaian Utang Melalui Pailit atau Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Bandung: Alumni, 2001.

Fuady, Munir. Hukum Pailit dalam Teori dan Praktek, Bandung: Sinar Aditya Bakti, 2014.¬¬

Hartini, Rahayu. Hukum Kepailitan. Edisi Revi-si. Malang: UMM Press, 2007.

Hernoko, Agus Yudha. Hukum Perjanjian, Asas Proporsional dalam Kontrak Komersial, Cetakan Keempat, Jakarta: Kencana Media Group, 2014.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud Penelitian Hukum Edi-si Revisi Kencana Perdana, Jakarta: Kencana Perdana Media Group, 2016.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Mengenal Hukum Sua-tu Pengantar, Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2003.

Mulyadi, Lilik. Perkara Kepailitan dan Penun-daan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU); Teori dan Praktik Dilengkapi Putusan-Putusan Pengadilan Niaga. Bandung: Alumni, 2013.

Sanjaya, Umar Haris. Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang dalam Hukum Kepailitan. Yogyakarta: NFP Publishing, 2014.

Santiago, Faisal. Hukum Niaga dan Kepailitan. Jakarta: Cintya Press, 2008.

Shubhan, M. Hadi. Hukum Kepailitan : Prinsip, Norma, dan Praktik di Peradilan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group, 2008.

Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy. Hukum Kepailitan. Ja-karta: Fajar Interpratama Mandiri, 2015.

Thesis

Purba, Maranatha. “Homologasi Penundaan kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU) Se-bagai Upaya Preventif Terjadinya Pailit (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung No 137K/PDT.SUS-PKPU/2014).†Thesis, Me-dan: Unversitas Sumatera Utara, 2019.

Websites

“Force Majeure dalam Kepailitan dan PKPU (presentasi webinar yang diselenggarakan oleh SNP Law Firm bekerjasama dengan benihbaik.com, 2020)â€, accessed on 13 De-cember 2021. https://www.hukum-online.com/klinik/detail/ulasan/lt5eb434d290044/perpanjangan-pkpu-sementara-imbas-wabah-covid-19/.

“Komite Penanganan Covid-19 dan Pemuli-han Ekonomi Nasional, Data Sebaranâ€, ac-cessed on 15 February 2020. https://covid19.go.id/.

Laws

Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Dasar Negara 1945.

Hindia Belanda, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (Burgerlijk Wetboek).

Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 Tentang Hak Asasi Manusia.

Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang.

Republik Indonesia, Keputusan Presiden Re-publik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2020 Tentang Penetapan Bencana Nonalam Penyebaran Corona Virus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) sebagai Bencana Nasional.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-30

How to Cite

Labibah, H. A. . (2022). Restructuring of Debt Payment Obligation Suspension Agreements Homologated Due to Covid-19 Non-Natural Disasters. Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 22(1), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v22i1.1229

Issue

Section

Articles