Restructuring of Debt Payment Obligation Suspension Agreements Homologated Due to Covid-19 Non-Natural Disasters
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v22i1.1229Keywords:
Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations, Homologation, Covid-19Abstract
The quick spread of the Covid-19 pandemic weakened the economy and led to the non-performance of debtors’ obligations because their business did not run smoothly during the period. Several business actors with homologated PKPU peace were hindered or prevented from achieving their aims including the force majeure qualifications associated with the Covid-19 pandemic. Therefore, this normative legal research conducted through statutory, conceptual, and case approaches was used to assess this situation. The findings showed that a debtor can request to restructure the homologation implementation based on the force majeure of the Covid-19 pandemic but the request needs to be based on the agreement between the debtor and creditor using Article 1338 paragraph (1) of the Civil Code as the premise. It was discovered from the PT Berlian Tenker case that the agreement was conducted without requiring further re-homologation in the court because the UUK-PKPU is not applicable in the matter due to the fact that the Covid-19 pandemic is a national disaster classified as a relative force majeure.
References
Journal Articles
Anand, Ghansam. “Prinsip Kebebasan Ber-kontrak dalam Penyelesaian Kontrak.†Yuridika, 26, 2 (2011): 90. DOI: 10.30742/perspektif.v11i3.276
Bagus, Putu & Ni Ketut S.D. “Kajian Force Majeure terkait Pemenuhan Prestasi Perjan-jian Komersial Pasca Penetapan Covid-19 sebagai Bencana Nasional.†Jurnal Kertha Semaya, 8, 6 (2020): 898. DOI: ojs.unud.ac.id/kerthasemaya/60631/35194
Hernoko, Agus Yudho. “Force Majeur Clause atau Hardship Clause Problematika dalam Perancangan Kontrak Bisnis.†Jurnal Per-spektif, XI, 2 (2006): 208. DOI: 10.30742/perspektif.v11i3.276
Irwanti, Kartika & Anggit Sinar Sitoresmi, “Permohonan Penundaan Kewajiban Pem-bayaran Utang dan Akibat Hukum ter-hadap PT. Asmin Koalindo Tuhup ber-dasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004.†Pandecta, 13, 2 (2019): 121. DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v14i2.16902
Kornelis, Yudi & Florianus Yudhi P.A. “Im-plementasi Restrukturisasi dalam Proses Kepailitan dan PKPU di Indonesia.†Jurnal Selat, 7, 2 (2020): 270. DOI: 10.24034/ j25485024.y2010.v14.i1.231
Parama, Putu A.W. & I Ketut A. “Akibat Hukum terhadap Debitor atas Terjadinya Force Majeure (Keadaan Memaksa).†Jurnal Kertha Semaya, 2, 6 (2014): 5. DOI: ojs.unud.ac.id/kerthasemaya/10277/7513
Respatia, Wimba. “Kebijakan Restrukturisasi Utang Melalui Debt To Equity Swap.†Ekui-tas, 4, 1 (2010):84. DOI: 10.24034/ j25485024.y2010.v14.i1.231
Books
Fred, BG Tumbuan dalam Rudy A Lontoh et.al (Editor). Hukum Kepailitan: Penyelesaian Utang Melalui Pailit atau Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Bandung: Alumni, 2001.
Fuady, Munir. Hukum Pailit dalam Teori dan Praktek, Bandung: Sinar Aditya Bakti, 2014.¬¬
Hartini, Rahayu. Hukum Kepailitan. Edisi Revi-si. Malang: UMM Press, 2007.
Hernoko, Agus Yudha. Hukum Perjanjian, Asas Proporsional dalam Kontrak Komersial, Cetakan Keempat, Jakarta: Kencana Media Group, 2014.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud Penelitian Hukum Edi-si Revisi Kencana Perdana, Jakarta: Kencana Perdana Media Group, 2016.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Mengenal Hukum Sua-tu Pengantar, Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2003.
Mulyadi, Lilik. Perkara Kepailitan dan Penun-daan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU); Teori dan Praktik Dilengkapi Putusan-Putusan Pengadilan Niaga. Bandung: Alumni, 2013.
Sanjaya, Umar Haris. Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang dalam Hukum Kepailitan. Yogyakarta: NFP Publishing, 2014.
Santiago, Faisal. Hukum Niaga dan Kepailitan. Jakarta: Cintya Press, 2008.
Shubhan, M. Hadi. Hukum Kepailitan : Prinsip, Norma, dan Praktik di Peradilan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group, 2008.
Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy. Hukum Kepailitan. Ja-karta: Fajar Interpratama Mandiri, 2015.
Thesis
Purba, Maranatha. “Homologasi Penundaan kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU) Se-bagai Upaya Preventif Terjadinya Pailit (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung No 137K/PDT.SUS-PKPU/2014).†Thesis, Me-dan: Unversitas Sumatera Utara, 2019.
Websites
“Force Majeure dalam Kepailitan dan PKPU (presentasi webinar yang diselenggarakan oleh SNP Law Firm bekerjasama dengan benihbaik.com, 2020)â€, accessed on 13 De-cember 2021. https://www.hukum-online.com/klinik/detail/ulasan/lt5eb434d290044/perpanjangan-pkpu-sementara-imbas-wabah-covid-19/.
“Komite Penanganan Covid-19 dan Pemuli-han Ekonomi Nasional, Data Sebaranâ€, ac-cessed on 15 February 2020. https://covid19.go.id/.
Laws
Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Dasar Negara 1945.
Hindia Belanda, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (Burgerlijk Wetboek).
Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 Tentang Hak Asasi Manusia.
Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang.
Republik Indonesia, Keputusan Presiden Re-publik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2020 Tentang Penetapan Bencana Nonalam Penyebaran Corona Virus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) sebagai Bencana Nasional.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Hanin Alya' Labibah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

